To our clients, colleagues and friends:
As 2022 draws to a close, we are reminded what an active year it has been for IP, privacy law, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Through this periodic newsletter, we continue to keep you informed of the most relevant and exciting developments.
First, some updates to topics we have reported on previously:
- Until now London’s Victoria & Albert Museum has been a notable holdout amidst the large-scale removal of the Sackler family name from museums in response to the family’s ownership of Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, and the company’s role in fueling the U.S. opioid epidemic. The V&A has now followed other major museums on both sides of the Atlantic and removed the Sackler name from its entrance courtyard.
- President Biden has issued an Executive Order designed to pave the way for implementation of a new safe harbor mechanism for GDPR-compliant data transfer to the U.S. The Executive Order limits and defines the situations in which personal data can be collected and establishes a new court within the Department of Justice to hear challenges. Specific guidance is forthcoming that will allow us to advise clients as to how to modify their privacy policies.
- As we await the Supreme Court’s decision in the important fair use case involving the Andy Warhol Foundation, we looked at the issue of how that decision may affect the broader art world. A question that was touched upon in the briefs of the parties and amici and in the argument involves the impact of a decision against the Warhol Foundation on the activities of museums.
In anticipation of the October holiday traditionally called Columbus Day, we posted an insight on the increasing observance of the day as Indigenous Peoples’ Day in recognition of the history of wrongs inflicted on our native population by European explorers. The renaming of the day coincides with an increasing recognition of the damage caused by the derogatory use of Native American names and attempts to rectify that damage.
Also in the realm of the arts, we looked at the unsettled copyright status of art generated by artificial intelligence. The Copyright Office has consistently taken the position that human authorship is a prerequisite to copyright registration in the U.S. A recent registration by the Copyright Office suggests that if a human is named as an author, works with AI-generated elements may be registered. Social media sites, buffeted with calls by artists to remove AI-generated content that they believe is unfairly jeopardizing their own sales, have been inconsistent in their responses to the problem.
As the holiday season approaches, we explored the privacy issues involved in direct-to-consumer DNA testing kits, a popular gift item. As we explain, the direct-to-consumer genealogy industry is largely self-regulated and, as such, the privacy practices employed by these companies are often inadequate to protect personal information.
Finally, we have published an insight on “Russian Doll” copyright infringement, which occurs when a copyrighted work “nestles” inside another copyrighted work, in the same way that Russian dolls nestle inside one another. Photographers should be wary about copyrighted works which may inadvertently appear within their photographs, such as sculptures or murals. Conversely, if an artist’s work appears in another copyrighted work without permission or a license, that artist may have recourse even for an unintentional infringement.
In firm news, in November Arnie and Susan Lutzker hosted about 60 members and guests of INBLF firms in Seaside, Florida, the first post-pandemic all-network gathering of the International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms. The 2022 Reunion/Retreat was attended by representatives of member firms from Australia, India, Dubai, Bolivia, the UK, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Canada. Jeannette Carmadella, Ben Sternberg and Carolyn Martin, in addition to Susan and Arnie, attended from Lutzker & Lutzker. Other U.S. members came from San Francisco, New York, Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, DC, Delaware, Pennsylvania, San Diego and San Jose. Business sessions focused on public benefit corporations and post-Covid issues for the courtroom and the office. Jeannette participated in a panel on retaining and attracting junior lawyers to boutique law firms. INBLF’s Task Force on Cybersecurity, Ransomware and Privacy discussed ways in which the network can help both member firms and clients protect their data against attack.
Also in November, Carolyn Martin gave a presentation on “Protecting Designs in the Virtual World” at the 2022 Design Rights Boot Camp, a virtual, five-day program hosted by the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA). Carolyn’s presentation focused on what brand owners should consider before entering the metaverse, licensing opportunities in the metaverse, the registration of virtual goods and the current body of case law. In addition, Carolyn was quoted in Bloomberg Law in the aftermath of BNSF Railway Co.’s loss in the first jury verdict in a biometric privacy class action.
Please don’t hesitate to reach out to us at email@example.com for more information on these developments or advice on your IP questions. And please have a safe, healthy and enjoyable holiday season!